A full editorial read of your novel. Every claim checked against your own pages.

A structured read of this manuscript: continuity, timeline, repetition, and the threads that go unpaid. Every passage we quote is mechanically re-located in your text before the report is sent.

$449 · ≤150k words · 72h · two full reads

The problem

Assessment starved. Cheap reports invent. Human edit priced for once per book.

Assessment starved

The tools market spent its money on generation. The questions that decide whether a book works still get answered by you, at midnight, about the one manuscript you cannot read cold.

Cheap reports invent

Automated critiques exist, and the cheap ones have a documented problem: they invent findings. A report you have to fact-check yourself is worse than no report.

Human edit, once per book

A developmental editor remains the reliable alternative: $1,200–$4,500 per manuscript at 2026 EFA and Reedsy rates, turnaround measured in weeks. Excellent work, priced for once per book rather than every revision pass.

What you receive

Feedback you can take back to the page.

Read the reasoning, inspect the source, and decide what belongs in your revision. The writing stays with you.

The evidence report

Findings with manuscript locations, an explanation of the concern, and a clear distinction between impact and confidence.

Readable HTML + PDF

Comments in context

Bring the feedback into your working document. Follow the references while keeping control of your language and decisions.

Word comments or annotated Markdown

A workable revision plan

Prioritize findings, record your choices, and return with your revised manuscript for the included second full read.

Revision workbook + follow-up report

One manuscript. Two full reads. Standard turnaround is 72 hours after written confirmation of a readable file and completed intake.

  1. Tell us about your book.

    Prepare a short intake and email your manuscript. We confirm the scope, readable files, payment, and delivery time.

  2. Get your first audit.

    Review the evidence report, manuscript comments, and revision workbook. See what was checked and what still needs judgment.

  3. Make your decisions.

    Revise at your own pace. Keep the voice, motifs, and choices that matter to your book.

  4. Come back for a second read.

    Submit a revised version of the same work within 12 months. We read it again and compare supported findings where possible.

How it is policed

Verify. Two reads. Judgment labelled.

Verify quotes

Each quoted passage is mechanically re-located in your manuscript. Anything that cannot be found is not presented as a confirmed source quotation.

Two reads

Every order is two full reads — revise and send it back. The remedy for disagreement is reading your revision, not a bonus feature.

Judgment labelled

Fact versus opinion versus unadjudicated candidates are marked as such. We will not dress a judgment as a measurement.

Proof

A finding should show its work.

Proof is the artifact, not a logo strip. One cropped illustration from the sample — source passages, then a revision decision.

Source passages
TimelineIllustrative finding
Test entry A · chapter 4
Departure: 08:00. Arrival: 10:00.
Test entry B · chapter 9
Elapsed travel time: six hours.

The two entries give different elapsed times. Whether that is a continuity problem depends on whether they describe the same journey in the same time frame.

Revision decision

Check the journey’s duration.

✓ source passages shown

Judgment labelled — context still required

Chapters 4 + 9 · compare journey records

Locate both passages. If they describe the same elapsed journey, reconcile the timing. If they describe different stages, clarify that distinction only if a reader needs it.

Fact — the times as written Judgment — whether they conflict Unadjudicated — marked, not confirmed

Format illustration using invented test entries. Not a customer report. Demotions and labelled judgment live in the full sample.

Read the full sample report

Fit

Best for / not for.

Best for

  • Working novelists with a complete draft who want a structured view of continuity, recurrence, and story threads before the next revision.
  • Authors who have seen thin or inventing critiques and want claims they can check on the page.
  • A serious pass you can run again after you revise — not a once-per-book event.

Not for

  • Instant critique shoppers. This is a 72-hour read, not a minutes report.
  • Anyone wanting a human developmental editor to hold the whole book. We will not imply otherwise.
  • Grammar, habit, or community tools. Wrong job.

Price

The Threadright Audit.

$449

USD · one manuscript · ≤150k words · 72h · two full reads · verification · labelled judgment · four typed guarantees

A structured whole-manuscript read with editorial adjudication, reviewed by a person before it is sent. Not a disposable instant critique. Not a full human developmental edit. Priced so it makes sense to run again after you revise.

A developmental editor will give you something this cannot: a single mind holding your whole book. This gives you something they cannot: every claim checked against your text, on every pass.

  • A full first-draft audit
  • Evidence report in HTML and PDF
  • Word comments or annotated Markdown
  • Revision priorities and workbook
  • A second full read within 12 months

Payment is not taken on this site. A payment link arrives with our confirmation email after we confirm a readable manuscript and completed intake.

Commissioning

Minutes to calibrate — not to create an account.

Answers calibrate the read to your book. There is no workspace, no dashboard, no signup. Nothing is charged on the intake page.

Motif whitelist

Declare recurring phrases you meant. They are recorded as deliberate, not reported as defects.

Formats

Word (.docx) or Markdown (.md). Chapters as headings. Unusual files — email us first.

Privacy

Never used to train our models. Working files deleted thirty days after delivery, unless you arrange retention for the second read.

Start intake

FAQ

Reasonable questions.

Is this a human editor?

No, and we will not imply otherwise. The analysis combines software checks and AI judgment. A human operator reviews the assembled report for quality control. That is different from a human editor reading and judging every finding. A developmental editor will give you something this cannot: a single mind holding your whole book. This gives you something they cannot: every claim checked against your text, on every pass.

Will it flag my deliberate repetitions?

Not if you tell us about them. The intake asks for motifs and recurring phrases you meant. Anything you declare is recorded as deliberate rather than reported as a defect.

Will it find every problem in my book?

No. A report can miss issues or make interpretations you disagree with. Source verification helps you inspect a finding; it does not make every diagnosis correct. Coverage and unresolved candidates are identified.

Can I use it mid-draft?

Yes, and it is built for that. Every paid order is two full reads rather than one, because structural findings are most useful while you can still act on them, and the second read is where you find out whether the revision worked.

What formats do you take?

Word (.docx) or Markdown (.md), with clear chapter headings. If your file is unusual, email us first. Your manuscript is never used to train our models and working files are deleted thirty days after delivery unless you arrange retention. Within fourteen days of delivery, if the report is not useful, tell us — for any reason you think is a reason.

When does the 72 hours start?

From our written confirmation that your manuscript is readable and your intake is complete. Preparing the form does not start that clock. Timing, payment, and any special arrangement are confirmed by email.

A full editorial read. Claims checked against your pages.

Two full reads · 72h · ≤150k words · $449