The evidence report
Findings with manuscript locations, an explanation of the concern, and a clear distinction between impact and confidence.
Readable HTML + PDF
A structured read of this manuscript: continuity, timeline, repetition, and the threads that go unpaid. Every passage we quote is mechanically re-located in your text before the report is sent.
$449 · ≤150k words · 72h · two full reads
The problem
The tools market spent its money on generation. The questions that decide whether a book works still get answered by you, at midnight, about the one manuscript you cannot read cold.
Automated critiques exist, and the cheap ones have a documented problem: they invent findings. A report you have to fact-check yourself is worse than no report.
A developmental editor remains the reliable alternative: $1,200–$4,500 per manuscript at 2026 EFA and Reedsy rates, turnaround measured in weeks. Excellent work, priced for once per book rather than every revision pass.
What you receive
Read the reasoning, inspect the source, and decide what belongs in your revision. The writing stays with you.
Findings with manuscript locations, an explanation of the concern, and a clear distinction between impact and confidence.
Readable HTML + PDF
Bring the feedback into your working document. Follow the references while keeping control of your language and decisions.
Word comments or annotated Markdown
Prioritize findings, record your choices, and return with your revised manuscript for the included second full read.
Revision workbook + follow-up report
One manuscript. Two full reads. Standard turnaround is 72 hours after written confirmation of a readable file and completed intake.
Prepare a short intake and email your manuscript. We confirm the scope, readable files, payment, and delivery time.
Review the evidence report, manuscript comments, and revision workbook. See what was checked and what still needs judgment.
Revise at your own pace. Keep the voice, motifs, and choices that matter to your book.
Submit a revised version of the same work within 12 months. We read it again and compare supported findings where possible.
How it is policed
Each quoted passage is mechanically re-located in your manuscript. Anything that cannot be found is not presented as a confirmed source quotation.
Every order is two full reads — revise and send it back. The remedy for disagreement is reading your revision, not a bonus feature.
Fact versus opinion versus unadjudicated candidates are marked as such. We will not dress a judgment as a measurement.
Proof
Proof is the artifact, not a logo strip. One cropped illustration from the sample — source passages, then a revision decision.
Departure: 08:00. Arrival: 10:00.
Elapsed travel time: six hours.
The two entries give different elapsed times. Whether that is a continuity problem depends on whether they describe the same journey in the same time frame.
Revision decision
✓ source passages shown
Judgment labelled — context still required
Locate both passages. If they describe the same elapsed journey, reconcile the timing. If they describe different stages, clarify that distinction only if a reader needs it.
Fact — the times as written Judgment — whether they conflict Unadjudicated — marked, not confirmed
Format illustration using invented test entries. Not a customer report. Demotions and labelled judgment live in the full sample.
Read the full sample reportGuarantees
A single money-back test does not work on a report like this. Half of it is decidable and half of it is a reading, so there are four, each saying what kind of thing it is.
Mechanical
If the report quotes a passage that does not appear in the manuscript you submitted, that report is free.
Verified-quotation termsRemedy
Disagreement’s answer is reading your revision of the same work, not a money-back argument.
Second-read termsEpistemic
Decidable facts versus a reader’s view versus unadjudicated candidates — marked as such.
What we will not pretendUseful-refund
Within fourteen days of delivery, for any reason you think is a reason. Manuscripts are not used for training, and working files are deleted thirty days after delivery unless you arrange retention.
Refund and privacyFit
Price
$449
USD · one manuscript · ≤150k words · 72h · two full reads · verification · labelled judgment · four typed guarantees
A structured whole-manuscript read with editorial adjudication, reviewed by a person before it is sent. Not a disposable instant critique. Not a full human developmental edit. Priced so it makes sense to run again after you revise.
A developmental editor will give you something this cannot: a single mind holding your whole book. This gives you something they cannot: every claim checked against your text, on every pass.
Payment is not taken on this site. A payment link arrives with our confirmation email after we confirm a readable manuscript and completed intake.
Commissioning
Answers calibrate the read to your book. There is no workspace, no dashboard, no signup. Nothing is charged on the intake page.
Declare recurring phrases you meant. They are recorded as deliberate, not reported as defects.
Word (.docx) or Markdown (.md). Chapters as headings. Unusual files — email us first.
Never used to train our models. Working files deleted thirty days after delivery, unless you arrange retention for the second read.
FAQ
No, and we will not imply otherwise. The analysis combines software checks and AI judgment. A human operator reviews the assembled report for quality control. That is different from a human editor reading and judging every finding. A developmental editor will give you something this cannot: a single mind holding your whole book. This gives you something they cannot: every claim checked against your text, on every pass.
Not if you tell us about them. The intake asks for motifs and recurring phrases you meant. Anything you declare is recorded as deliberate rather than reported as a defect.
No. A report can miss issues or make interpretations you disagree with. Source verification helps you inspect a finding; it does not make every diagnosis correct. Coverage and unresolved candidates are identified.
Yes, and it is built for that. Every paid order is two full reads rather than one, because structural findings are most useful while you can still act on them, and the second read is where you find out whether the revision worked.
Word (.docx) or Markdown (.md), with clear chapter headings. If your file is unusual, email us first. Your manuscript is never used to train our models and working files are deleted thirty days after delivery unless you arrange retention. Within fourteen days of delivery, if the report is not useful, tell us — for any reason you think is a reason.
From our written confirmation that your manuscript is readable and your intake is complete. Preparing the form does not start that clock. Timing, payment, and any special arrangement are confirmed by email.
Two full reads · 72h · ≤150k words · $449